Choosing the right tool for creating applications that work on many different devices, that's a big deal for developers these days. It's a bit like picking the right set of tools for a big building project; you want something that helps you build quickly and keeps things simple to look after later. We all want to make things that reach as many people as possible, and that means making sure our apps run smoothly whether someone is using a phone, a tablet, or a computer. This push for broader reach is why cross-platform development has become such a hot topic, and it's something many folks are thinking about a lot right now.

In this busy world of software creation, .NET MAUI has stepped onto the stage as a key player, promising to make that cross-platform dream a bit more real for those working with .NET. It's supposed to be a single framework that lets you build apps for Android, iOS, macOS, and Windows, all from one shared code base. This idea sounds very appealing, offering a way to save time and effort, which is, you know, really valuable.

But what's the actual story behind the marketing? What does the "maui face" truly reveal when you look closely? There's a lot of talk, some of it quite hopeful, and some of it a bit more cautious. We'll explore what people are saying, what the framework aims to be, and some of the real-world experiences folks are having with it. It's about seeing what's really there, the good bits and the bits that still need a bit of work.

• Jens Husband
• Jack Nicholson And Son Side By Side

Table of Contents

• Understanding .NET MAUI: A Brief History
• The Vision for MAUI: Looking to 2025
• The Other Side of the `maui face`: Key Criticisms
• MAUI's Place Among Cross-Platform Tools
• Comparing MAUI: Flutter, WPF, and More
• Navigating MAUI's Development Experience
• The Future `maui face`: What Comes Next?
• Common Questions About MAUI

Understanding .NET MAUI: A Brief History

So, to get a good sense of what .NET MAUI is all about, it helps to know where it came from. This framework, you know, was first announced back in May of 2020. It didn't just appear out of nowhere, though. MAUI is, actually, an evolution, a next step, for Xamarin.Forms. That means if you've ever worked with Xamarin.Forms before, you'll probably find some familiar ideas and ways of doing things in MAUI. It's a bit like learning a new version of a game you already know; some things are different, but the core mechanics are still there. This connection to its past is, in a way, one of its defining features, allowing developers with existing Xamarin experience to perhaps transition a little more smoothly.

The Vision for MAUI: Looking to 2025

Looking ahead, there's a pretty clear picture of what MAUI is intended to be, especially when we think about the year 2025. By then, it's envisioned as a really solid, mature cross-platform framework. It's supposed to be a particularly good choice for projects where you need to get things done quickly and keep the costs of looking after the software quite low. The idea is that it will have made some really big steps forward in how well it performs, how much help its tools give you, and how many different kinds of devices and systems it can reach. This sounds, you know, very promising for developers who want efficiency. However, even with all these good points, there's still a sense that its wider ecosystem, all the little bits and pieces that support it, and how well it fits with every specific platform, still need a bit more polishing. It's a bit like having a fast new car that still needs a few more service stations on the road.

The Other Side of the `maui face`: Key Criticisms

Now, it's only fair to look at the other side of the coin, the parts of the `maui face` that cause some folks to feel a bit unsure. There's a feeling among some developers that Microsoft, the company behind MAUI, hasn't had the best track record with user interface frameworks after WPF. Some even suggest that each new attempt has been less successful than the last. It's a bit of a strong opinion, but it's out there. For example, even WPF, which many people liked, didn't really take off in a huge way; it was, you know, popular in concept but not always in widespread use. As of 2021, some even pointed out that there were still more job openings for the older WinForms than for WPF, which is, honestly, a bit surprising for a newer framework. This history, some argue, makes them a little wary about MAUI's long-term prospects.

• Jellyfish Haircut Long Hair
• All The Winners Of The Great British Bake Off

Another point of discussion is MAUI's overall size. Some say it's, you know, quite a bit larger compared to something like Flutter. This can make it less suitable if you're trying to add it into an application that's already built and running. It's like trying to fit a big piece of furniture into a small room; it just might not work out easily. There's also some strong feeling about MAUI's claim to be cross-platform when it, apparently, doesn't officially support Linux. This strikes some as a bit arrogant, especially when you look at Google's Flutter, which, you know, makes mobile devices a top priority and supports them well. This lack of full platform reach is, for some, a real sticking point. And it's not just Linux; some people are also put off because MAUI doesn't even support Windows 7, which, as a matter of fact, many people still use.

MAUI's Place Among Cross-Platform Tools

When you consider all the options for building apps that run on different systems, MAUI is, of course, just one choice among several. It's part of a group of tools that aim to solve the same problem. For instance, on the .NET side of things, besides MAUI, you also have frameworks like Avalonia and Uno Platform. These are all trying to be the best way to create cross-platform applications using .NET. So, a developer thinking about their next project has, you know, a few different paths they could go down. It's not a one-size-fits-all situation, and each tool has its own unique qualities that might make it a better fit for certain kinds of work.

Comparing MAUI: Flutter, WPF, and More

To truly get a handle on the `maui face`, it helps to see how it stacks up against other popular frameworks. We've already touched on Flutter, which, as I was saying, some see as a more lightweight option, especially for mobile apps. Flutter's focus on mobile first, and its support for Linux, are things that some developers really appreciate, unlike MAUI's current stance on Linux. It's a pretty big difference, you know, in how they approach platform coverage.

Then there's the comparison with older Microsoft frameworks, particularly WPF. Some people feel that MAUI just doesn't offer the same kind of flexibility when you're building for Windows. This often comes down to the ecosystem around WPF, which has, basically, many well-established controls and style libraries that MAUI, apparently, doesn't quite have yet. It's like having a well-stocked workshop versus one that's still building up its tools. Also, it's worth noting that the names for controls and their properties can be different across pure MAUI, WinUI3, and WPF. This can be a bit confusing for developers trying to move between them, or for those who are used to the older ways of doing things. For example, a developer using Visual Studio 2022 and .NET 6.0 for a MAUI app might find they can't easily locate properties like `WindowStyle` or `ResizeMode`, which are, you know, common in WPF. This difference in how you control window behavior can be a bit of a hurdle.

Interestingly, some developers are actually leaning towards MAUI even when comparing it to Apple's SwiftUI. The reason? Xcode, Apple's development environment, can be, honestly, a bit challenging to use. And SwiftUI, some argue, doesn't have such a huge advantage over MAUI that it makes up for Xcode's difficulties. Plus, if an AI product, for instance, starts doing really well and needs to go cross-platform later, choosing MAUI from the start might save you from having to rewrite everything from scratch. This is, you know, a practical consideration for many.

And let's not forget Blazor. Some people suggest that a "Blazor one-shot" approach, based on web technologies, could be a very strong alternative. This highlights that there are many ways to build cross-platform apps, and what works best really depends on the specific project and what you're trying to achieve. So, in some respects, MAUI is competing not just with other native-like frameworks, but also with web-based solutions.

Navigating MAUI's Development Experience

The experience of actually building with MAUI is, for many, a key part of its `maui face`. As mentioned, some developers using the latest versions of Visual Studio 2022 with .NET 6.0 have run into situations where they can't find familiar properties for windows, like `WindowStyle` or `ResizeMode`, which were, you know, pretty standard in WPF. This can make customizing the look and feel of your application's windows a bit less straightforward than some might expect. It points to a difference in how MAUI approaches window management compared to its predecessors. These kinds of details, actually, really shape a developer's day-to-day work. It's not always about the big features, but also about these smaller, everyday interactions with the framework.

The Future `maui face`: What Comes Next?

So, what does the future hold for the `maui face`? The vision for 2025 suggests a framework that's, basically, quite strong in performance, tool support, and its ability to cover various platforms. However, there's a clear recognition that the wider ecosystem and how well it adapts to each specific platform still need more attention. This means more controls, more community contributions, and perhaps a smoother integration with each operating system's unique features. The criticisms about Linux and Windows 7 support, and the comparisons to frameworks like Flutter, point to areas where MAUI could, arguably, grow to be even more universally appealing. It's a continuous process of improvement, you know, making things better step by step. The path ahead involves, in some respects, listening to developer feedback and making sure the framework truly delivers on its cross-platform promises for everyone.

Common Questions About MAUI

Is MAUI truly cross-platform, given its current support?

MAUI aims to be a single framework for Android, iOS, macOS, and Windows. However, as a matter of fact, some folks point out that it doesn't officially support Linux, and it also doesn't work on Windows 7. This means while it covers many major platforms, it's not, you know, fully universal across all common operating systems that developers might want to target. Its cross-platform reach is significant, but it's important to be aware of these specific limitations.

How does MAUI compare to older Microsoft UI frameworks like WPF?

When you look at MAUI next to WPF, some developers feel that MAUI offers less flexibility, especially for Windows applications. This is often because WPF has, basically, a much more mature collection of controls and styling options built up over many years, which MAUI is still developing. Also, the names for controls and their properties can be different between MAUI, WinUI3, and WPF, which can make moving between them a bit of a learning curve. So, while MAUI is newer and designed for broader reach, it doesn't, apparently, always match the depth of customization that WPF offers on Windows just yet.

Is MAUI a good choice for small, embedded projects?

Some people suggest that MAUI might be, you know, a bit on the larger side when compared to other frameworks like Flutter. This can make it less ideal if you're trying to embed it into an application that's already in place, or if you're working on a very small project where every bit of file size counts. For projects that need to be very lean or fit into existing software, its size could be a consideration that pushes developers towards other, more compact solutions.

So, as we consider the `maui face`, it's clear that .NET MAUI presents a compelling vision for cross-platform development, particularly for those already working within the .NET ecosystem. It promises speed and lower maintenance, and by 2025, it's expected to be a very capable tool with improved performance and broader platform reach. However, it's also important to acknowledge the real challenges it faces, such as its perceived size compared to some competitors, the current lack of official Linux and Windows 7 support, and the ongoing need to build out its ecosystem to match the richness of older frameworks like WPF. The choice to use MAUI, therefore, truly depends on your specific project needs, your team's existing skills, and how these various aspects align with what you want to build. You can learn more about cross-platform development on our site, and perhaps consider how this information relates to your next project by looking at our solutions page. For official information, you might check out the official Microsoft MAUI documentation.